Home Page link  

K-1 question

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
K-1 question Todd 06-24-2007
---> Re: K-1 question Benjamin Yazers...06-26-2007
`--> Re: K-1 question Drew Edmundson07-12-2007
Posted by Seth on July 12, 2007, 1:48 am
Please log in for more thread options

>> Shouldn't that be "recourse debt"? It's the at-risk amount
>> that matters, and non-recourse debt isn't at risk.

> The original post mentioned that he/she was a passive
> partner. So, I think to a passive (or limited) partner the
> non recourse debt will increase basis for deducting losses.

Non-recourse debt isn't money at risk, so it shouldn't
increase the amount of deductible losses.

Seth

<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by Drew Edmundson on July 12, 2007, 8:51 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> I'm looking at a K-1 (form 1065) for a passive partner of a
> real estate venture. The partners capital account is
> negative $35,000 at the beginning of the period. The amount
> in box 2, Net Real Estate Income (Loss) is negative $15,000,
> bringing ending net capital to negative $50,000. Is the
> taxpayer allowed the loss on her current 1040?

There are at least three tests that a partner has to pass in
order to be able to deduct a loss.

1) Basis test - see Sections 704(d), 705, et al
2) At risk test - see Section 465
3) Passive Activity test - see Section 469

So you start with basis. If no loss allowed there then you
can stop. If enough basis then you go to see if enough is
"at risk" to allow the loss. If so then you run the passive
activity test to see if the loss is allowed. Must pass all
three or the loss is suspended. Assuming (and if you didn't
prepare the 1065 then what else can you do?) the nonrecourse
debt was properly allocated to your client on his k-1 then
it is part of his basis. Only qualified nonrecourse debt is
included for the at risk test.

Unfortunately the negative capital account may or may not
have much to do with his basis. Was your client an original
partner? Have any of the basis adjustments of 734(b) and
743(b) been made? Does the partnership follow the rules of
704(c), like it should? Did your partner contribute
property with a different basis than FMV at any point? From
what you have given us there is no way to tell what her
basis is nor can we tell what her at risk basis is.

--
Drew Edmundson, CPA
Cary, NC

<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
IRA question November 2, 2006, 11:56 pm
Question January 18, 2007, 4:01 am
W-2 Box 12 question April 13, 2007, 3:31 am
HSA Question September 12, 2007, 10:05 pm
MLP Tax Question September 20, 2007, 1:00 am
HoH question October 13, 2007, 11:06 pm
Re: HoH question October 17, 2007, 2:09 am
Re: HoH question October 17, 2007, 11:42 pm
Another Soc Sec question October 29, 2007, 11:26 pm
Second Question January 10, 2008, 9:08 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap