|
Posted by Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, AB on October 1, 2009, 2:01 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>> Dick Adams wrote:
>
>>> Taxpayer took a job in Canada amd rented his home. Tenant
>>> requested a 10 year lease because they wanted to build an
>>> attached garage. Seven years later the tenant and spouse
>>> died in a car accident.
>>>
>>> Am I correct that the garage is a leasehold improvement
>>> that adds to the taxpayer's basis?
>>>
>> Here is the question I would ask a client in such a case:
>> Was the cost of the added garage included in income as rental
>> income back then? If so, then that increase in basis 10 years
>> ago would have started to be depreciated for 27.5 years.
>>
>> If not;;;?? it should have been.
>
> As I recall there was a provision in the tax code (is it still
> there?) that says leasehold improvements made by a tenant but
> benefit the landlord at the end of the lease, are not taxed to the
> landlord.
>
> If there's no tax on the improvement, seems to me there'd be no
> increase in basis for it, either.
>
> --
> Stu
> http://downtoearthlawyer.com
I really want to be Stuart on this one - the only increase you should get in
basis would be due to any income you reported as a result of the
improvement.
However, I'm not sure about this. Please not that I said NOT SURE, because
I'm not. I'd want to research it get an answer you could rely on, but I am
concerned about:
1 - windfall benefit. If you buy a desk for $100 and find an original Monet
in one of the drawers isn't there some windfall tax that you'd be
responsible for? Would this impact basis?
2 - what about those home improvement shows, where they fix up or completely
rebuild a home. I believe that the value of these improvements is
considered income to the home owners, in which case if they paid tax on it,
it should add to basis.
3 - is there any argument that the house WOULD have rented for more had it
had a garage and it was rented for less under the condition that the garage
be built and transferred to the owner upon termination of the lease? I
think this is similar to Harland's position, which I think may have merit.
Let us know what you find out (or decide to do),
Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, ABA
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|