Home Page link  

Minimum expense requiring receipts?

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Minimum expense requiring receipts? veg_all 01-29-2007
Posted by veg_all on January 29, 2007, 2:11 am
Please log in for more thread options
I recall reading that if an expense is under $35 you do not
need a receipt. Is that correct? Seems like a lot of
non-value added work to keep track of such small amounts..

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Posted by Paul Thomas, CPA on January 30, 2007, 11:50 am
Please log in for more thread options

> I recall reading that if an expense is under $35 you do not
> need a receipt. Is that correct?

Nope. You need to be able to prove all your claimed expenses.

> Seems like a lot of non-value added work to keep track of such small
> amounts..

But you bothered to remember to deduct it. $35 x 15% tax
rate is $5.25.....about the cost of lunch if you eat on the
cheap. Yeah, it's worth tracking.

--
Paul Thomas, CPA
paulthomascpapc@bellsouth.net

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Posted by L K Williams on January 30, 2007, 11:50 am
Please log in for more thread options
eg_all@yahoo.com wrote:

> I recall reading that if an expense is under $35 you do not
> need a receipt. Is that correct? Seems like a lot of
> non-value added work to keep track of such small amounts..
>

Like so many answers here, the answer to your question is:
"It depends."

First of all, you raise two issues -- having receipts and
keeping track of expenses. The tax code requires you to
keep records of all business income and expense; to keep
records of all amounts reported on your return, whether
income or expense. This has nothing to do with keeping
receipts and there is no de minimis amount; either keep
track or don't deduct.

Generally, you have to have some documentation of all
deductible expenditures; proof of what you paid, to whom,
why, and how much. In the case of travel, meals, and
entertainment, you do not need a receipt for expenditures of
$75 dollars or less, unless a receipt is normally given.
So, a $70 taxi fare would not require a receipt but a $60
hotel bill would.

Most dine-in restaurants provide some sort of bill,
McDonalds don't.

Lanny K. Williams, CPA
Nawarat, Williams & Co., Ltd.
Income Tax Services for Expatriate Americans

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Posted by Seth Breidbart on January 30, 2007, 9:52 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> I recall reading that if an expense is under $35 you do not
> need a receipt. Is that correct?

You need records, not necessarily a receipt.

> Seems like a lot of
> non-value added work to keep track of such small amounts..

It's _more_ work to keep adequate records in the absence of
receipts.

Seth

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
Missing some receipts? September 15, 2008, 3:24 pm
Definition of NJ Gross Receipts February 10, 2008, 2:45 pm
Minimum income for NYS filing... March 17, 2008, 7:56 am
Can a CEO elect to have a salary less than the minimum wage? December 29, 2006, 8:52 pm
bank error in minimum distribution - January 30, 2007, 11:11 am
Calif. & Fed Minimum Income for Filing? June 21, 2007, 5:43 pm
Minimum Earned Income for Trad. IRA Ded. April 8, 2008, 11:27 am
Minimum taxes for various form of business entities in NYC February 27, 2007, 3:17 pm
Any Way to Avoid Alternative Minimum Tax on Stock Options Exercised in 2008? July 6, 2008, 8:52 pm
Social Security Survivors Benefits - Minimum Length of Marriage to Qualify? January 3, 2007, 10:49 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap