Home Page link  

Moderator: What Robomoderation means to you

  
Groups | Search | About
User Password
Register Now! Lost Password?

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Moderator: What Robomoderation means to you Dick Adams 11-17-2007
Posted by Dick Adams on November 17, 2007, 2:03 am
Please log in for more thread options
 I have decided to switch over to robomoderation now so that
I am here to take care of any conversion problems.

What this means to you is that
1) If you are on the approved list, your submissions
will be automatically approved and posted; or
2) Your submissions are reviewed by the team Mark Bole
is putting together.

While I am in Australia crossing the Nullarbor, Stu or his
designee will be in charge of the moderation team as well
as the Complaint Department. I am confident that he will
as vigilant as I have been when it comes to dismissing
complaints.

What changes will there be:
1. I will be unable to harass Harlan directly as the
moderator will no longer be able to add comments.
2. There will be rejection notices, but not for
sociopaths.

Reasons for rejection notices:
Top-posted reply
Signature is too long
Inappropriate commercial content
Incorrect capitalization or ALL CAPS
Copyrighted material
Crossposting
Technical violation of charter (HTML, binary, too long, control)
Duplicate submission
Unprofessional comments
Inappropriate political content
(Please note that polite/humorous attacks on tax issues against
Congress, the Executive Branch, and Johnny and the Supremes are
generally acceptable - but naming individuals is NOT). Also
this newsgroup is not available for comments pro or con on the
war.)

Reasons for deletion without a rejection notice:
Arguing with the moderator
Tax protester or other sociopath
Submission is grossly off-topic
Spam

Nothing is absolute - except my decisions. ;-)

Please remember "Precedent means nothing to me."

<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The above is intended for educational purposes only. >>
<< It does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. >>
<< It cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of >>
<< the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed >>
<< upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by Harlan Lunsford on November 17, 2007, 6:54 pm
Please log in for more thread options
 Dick Adams wrote:

> I have decided to switch over to robomoderation now so that
> I am here to take care of any conversion problems.
>
> What this means to you is that
> 1) If you are on the approved list, your submissions
> will be automatically approved and posted; or
> 2) Your submissions are reviewed by the team Mark Bole
> is putting together.
>
> While I am in Australia crossing the Nullarbor, Stu or his
> designee will be in charge of the moderation team as well
> as the Complaint Department. I am confident that he will
> as vigilant as I have been when it comes to dismissing
> complaints.
>
> What changes will there be:
> 1. I will be unable to harass Harlan directly as the
> moderator will no longer be able to add comments.

(balance snipped for brevity's sake.

Improvements are always welcome! (grin)

Seriously though, bon voyage, Dick. You'll be achieving a
long time goal to go "down under", and hopefully next year
I'll finally get to visit Russia.

ChEAr$, Mate! Tovarich!
Harlan

Moderator:
I do plan to solicit the Noo Yawk Times as a sponsor and
have them give you a free subscription. Maybe I can have
Charlie Daniels write a song about the boys at Dew Drop Inn
learning you read the NYT.

<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by Paul Thomas, CPA on November 19, 2007, 6:10 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> I have decided to switch over to robomoderation now so that
> I am here to take care of any conversion problems.
>
> What this means to you is that
> 1) If you are on the approved list, your submissions
> will be automatically approved and posted; or
> 2) Your submissions are reviewed by the team Mark Bole
> is putting together.

Does this "robomoderation" allow you more time to judge beer
tasting contests?

If so, why didn't you institute this earlier?

Moderator:
1. Yes
2. I was sober.

<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by Seth on November 19, 2007, 6:10 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> Reasons for rejection notices:
. . .
> (Please note that polite/humorous attacks on tax issues against
> Congress, the Executive Branch, and Johnny and the Supremes are
> generally acceptable - but naming individuals is NOT).

I trust that wouldn't apply to a submission of the form
"Congressman X has submitted the following ridiculous tax
proposal: . . ."

Seth

Moderator:
It's not really a change. It's always been that way.
You can't attack Congressman X or his legislative history
even if he is the village idiot. But his tax proposals
are fair game. You can, as you well know, make any
professionally crafted derogatory remarks against the
House or the Senate taken as a whole.

<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
Moderator: Going to robomoderation very soon November 12, 2007, 7:36 am
Means-testing Medicare Part B premiums December 13, 2006, 10:38 pm
Moderator: Possible Outage February 14, 2007, 3:31 pm
Moderator: Problems March 3, 2007, 4:29 am
Moderator: Possible Outage April 3, 2007, 6:44 pm
Moderator: I am back April 9, 2007, 2:12 am
Moderator: What is this stuff? April 10, 2007, 9:28 am
Re: Moderator: What is this stuff? April 11, 2007, 11:28 pm
Moderator: Off to see the Wizard April 19, 2007, 8:11 pm
Moderator: MTM is moving May 11, 2007, 5:48 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap