|
Posted by paulthomascpa on October 15, 2009, 8:28 am
Please log in for more thread options
> The State of Colorado is concerned that they might lose in a certain
> case they are litigating (Noble Energy). So they have issued
> assessments to Colorado taxpayers who have been filing "correctly,"
> i.e., the way the state says they should have been filing. In other
> words, instead of a taxpayer filing a protective refund claim pending
> the outcome of certain litigation, the state is filing protective
> assessment claims. It is ironic to get an assessment for filing
> returns based on a position that the state of Colorado claims is the
> correct interpretation. Has anyone ever heard of another state doing
> that?
I'm not following the case, so help me with the logic for a second.
Colorado might lose a case in which they get to collect more taxes? And
they're fighting this, why?
--
Paul Thomas, CPA
www.paulthomascpa.com
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|