Home Page link  

Re: Does George Will Understand Social Security Taxes?

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Does George Will Understand Social Security Taxes? dpb 04-29-2008
Posted by dpb on April 29, 2008, 6:54 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Victor Roberts wrote:
...
> Third, even if there was only one wage earner, he has
> conveniently over-calculated the additional tax by a factor
> of 2. He has used the total rate of 12.4% instead of the
> employee rate of 6.2%..

That part, at least, is _not_ a miscalculation. It's why they did what
they did to hide the magnitude of the tax from the taxpayer, but it's a
tax nonetheless.

--

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by dpb on April 30, 2008, 12:10 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Katie wrote:
...
> Well, whose pocket it really comes out of is subject to debate. If
> the employer didn't have to pay its half of the FICA taxes, would it
> increase the employee's compensation by that amount? Maybe so, maybe
> not. Maybe the cost comes out of the employer's profit or is
> recovered by a higher price to the employer's customers -- or, most
> likely, some combination of the three.

Of the three, I'd suggest the first is _not_ the likely place... :)

It's the same argument that businesses pay taxes -- sure, sorta', but
that money isn't money they printed for the purpose.

--

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: Does George Will Understand Social Security Taxes? April 29, 2008, 7:23 pm
Re: Does George Will Understand Social Security Taxes? April 30, 2008, 7:26 pm
Re: Does George Will Understand Social Security Taxes? May 1, 2008, 4:34 pm
Social security taxes October 26, 2007, 11:52 pm
Re: Social security taxes October 30, 2007, 11:47 pm
Congress social security taxes October 26, 2007, 11:51 pm
Questions About US/Swiss Income Taxes on Social Security Benefits August 17, 2007, 12:02 am
Questions About US/Swiss Income Taxes on Social Security Benefits August 17, 2007, 12:07 am
Re: Questions About US/Swiss Income Taxes on Social Security Benefits August 21, 2007, 11:53 pm
Social Security Tax March 21, 2008, 4:25 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap