|
Posted by Harlan Lunsford on June 12, 2006, 8:40 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Perplexed wrote:
> Perplexed wrote:
>> TxSrv wrote:
>>> The original IRS letter has to be an error, since you cannot
>>> represent t/p's on a driver's license. :-)
>> I received another letter from the IRS regarding this
>> taxpayer on a different matter (failure to file). After
>> calling IRS I sent them a letter. My call to IRS was
>> interesting, at some point I was connected to a
>> representative who evidently could see the taxpayer's
>> records and uttered a quiet 'Oh dear, we've got to fix
>> that!'.
> On May 11 sent IRS a signed letter with my name and address.
> My letter gave them the taxpayers name and SSN, included
> the form numbers and dates of eariler corrispondence from
> them. I stated that "I do not know (taxpayer name) and am
> not his represnetative.... I am not, nor have ever been, a
> representative of (taxpayer). Please correct your records
> and communicate with him directly."
>
> Received a notice from IRS today, Employee V. Dailey checked
> box 12, "A revocation of the authorization by the
> representative must include. 1) A clear identifiaction of
> taxpayer, 2) A clear identification of the thrid party, 3)
> Specific tax matters e.g. tye of tax and period(s) and 4)
> Your dated signature. ..."
>
> JEESH!!! What haven't I said?????
If you had just told us about the letter before getting the
IRS reply, my prediction would have been just the way they
handled it.
I think you have done all you need to do. Just forget about
it. No need to waste another 39 cent stamp.
ChEAr$,
Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA
<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only >>
<< and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting >>
<< messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>
|