|
Posted by Stuart Bronstein on September 29, 2007, 3:44 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>>> Seriously, I don't think the reasons for my inquiring about
>>> such ancient history should be needed in order to answer my
>>> questions.
>> Normally, no. But your reasons might give information that
>> could help figure out what this is all about, and how to solve it.
> Ohfersure, in general. I wasn't saying: "I don't know why
> you are asking for my reasons". I was saying: "I
> understand enough about the problem to know that knowledge
> of the circumstances will not help to answer my questions".
Unless you know the answer to the question, you really can't
say that with any assurance.
> I realize I am missing some (large?) pieces of the jigsaw
> puzzle. But I was hoping that someone could fill them in.
> Sigh, probably not.
Unfortunately not without more information.
Stu
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|