Home Page link  

Sale of residence - 1031 exchange

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Sale of residence - 1031 exchange finniganps 06-03-2006
Posted by finniganps on June 3, 2006, 9:44 am
Please log in for more thread options
Facts are: Taxpayer and wife had two homes (house 1, house
2) which they lived in many years ago and later rented to
third parties continuously. Both homes are located in CA.
The last one they lived in (home 2) as their principal
residence was in 1995 (they had lived there for 10 years).
Then they sold both properties with a low basis in 2001 as
part of a 1031 exchange for House 3 that cost more than the
two combined and was located in FL.

2001 was the last year taxpayer filed in CA because they
moved out of state. No CA tax was paid on the 1031 exchange
in 2001. House 3 was rented for at least 12 months and then
taxpayer moved into it as the principal residence in 2003.
They put in extra cash/took on debt to purchase house 3.
They sold house 3 in 2006 for a gain. It appears to me that
the entire gain deferred under 1031 is taxable under
=A7121(d)(10). Do you agree, or am I missing something? I
believe it is all taxable because,

a) There was no 121 exclusion in 2001 on home 2 because they
didn't meet the 2 of 5 rule (so carryover basis applies).

b) Home 3 does not meet the standard under =A7121(d)(10)
which says they must live there 5 years if the property was
part of a 1031 exchange. They lived there more than 2 years,
but not 5.

c) Some of the transaction will be taxes at 25% for any 1245
property.

d) There's also a question of whether CA is entitiled to
some of this gain even though they no longer have a tax
presence in CA, but arguably some of the gain is CA sourced.

Any thoughts on this computation - I assume it would be
based on CA tax deferred from 2001 values sold as opposed to
2006?

Am I missing anything? Any additional thoughts on this?

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only >>
<< and does NOT constitute legal OR professional advice. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting >>
<< messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
1031 Exchange September 18, 2008, 8:52 am
1031 exchange or other alternatives February 27, 2007, 3:17 pm
1031 Exchange Question April 20, 2008, 10:20 am
1031 exchange of turnkey rental April 25, 2007, 3:58 am
1031 Starker tax free exchange and AMT: does boot trigger AMT even with other offsetting capital gain losses? April 19, 2007, 3:52 am
Sale of NYC residence June 26, 2008, 9:49 am
Re: Tax Problem from Sale of Residence April 12, 2006, 11:28 pm
Re: Tax Problem from Sale of Residence April 12, 2006, 11:28 pm
Re: Tax Problem from Sale of Residence April 14, 2006, 3:45 am
Re: Tax Problem from Sale of Residence April 15, 2006, 3:18 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap