Home Page link  

Schedule M-3 for 1065

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Schedule M-3 for 1065 Mike20878 03-30-2007
Posted by Mike20878 on March 30, 2007, 4:35 am
Please log in for more thread options
I have a partnership that meets the new requirement to file
schedule M-3 this year. We are running into a problem
determining how we will track tax basis going forward if we
are forced to convert partner capital to book basis to
reconcile to the M-3. It's my understanding that schedule
M-2 line 3 should equal the audited book income, whereas in
the past we used a tax basis balance sheet and book income
(simply taxable income less nondeductibles). Is it
permissible to continue to do this for the M-2 and reconcile
the difference to schedule L with a statement? The
instructions for the M-2 say that a partnership "may, but is
not required to, use the rules in Regulations section
1.704-1(b) (2)(iv) to determine the partners'' capital
accounts... If the beginning and ending capital accounts
reported under these rules differ from the amounts reported
on Schedule L, attach a statement reconciling any
differences." Does anyone have a summary of this
regulation? I looked it up but I don't completely follow
what it says.

Put another way, do we have to report the audited balance
sheet or can we continue to use a tax basis balance sheet
and still reconcile audited income on the M-3? Is it
permissible for M-2 line 3 net income to differ from M-3,
Part I, Line 11? The reconciliation statement of schedule L
partners' capital to M-2 should explain the difference.

Is anyone encountering this and/or using RIA GoSystem Tax
RS?

Thanks.

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Posted by Drew Edmundson on March 30, 2007, 11:25 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> I have a partnership that meets the new requirement to file
> schedule M-3 this year. We are running into a problem
> determining how we will track tax basis going forward if we
> are forced to convert partner capital to book basis to
> reconcile to the M-3. It's my understanding that schedule
> M-2 line 3 should equal the audited book income, whereas in
> the past we used a tax basis balance sheet and book income
> (simply taxable income less nondeductibles). Is it
> permissible to continue to do this for the M-2 and reconcile
> the difference to schedule L with a statement? The
> instructions for the M-2 say that a partnership "may, but is
> not required to, use the rules in Regulations section
> 1.704-1(b) (2)(iv) to determine the partners'' capital
> accounts... If the beginning and ending capital accounts
> reported under these rules differ from the amounts reported
> on Schedule L, attach a statement reconciling any
> differences." Does anyone have a summary of this
> regulation? I looked it up but I don't completely follow
> what it says.
>
> Put another way, do we have to report the audited balance
> sheet or can we continue to use a tax basis balance sheet
> and still reconcile audited income on the M-3? Is it
> permissible for M-2 line 3 net income to differ from M-3,
> Part I, Line 11? The reconciliation statement of schedule L
> partners' capital to M-2 should explain the difference.

Wow, your partners' capital accounts match their basis? I
don't have any partnerships where that is the case. I track
the tax basis separately. The same way you do for clients'
who own partnership interest where you don't prepare the
partnership's return.

--
Drew Edmundson, CPA
Cary, NC

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
Form 1065 February 13, 2007, 1:30 am
Amended 1065 return April 5, 2007, 1:49 am
How to sign Form 1065 April 5, 2007, 1:49 am
Cost Basis of PTP's on K-1/1065 April 19, 2008, 4:26 pm
Entry of Capital Gain and Depreciation Recapture on Form 1065 January 2, 2007, 4:07 am
Where do I report dividends paid on Form 5471 Schedule C or Schedule F March 12, 2008, 9:23 am
Schedule C or Form 4137 + Schedule U ? March 30, 2007, 4:35 am
schedule C February 27, 2007, 10:30 pm
Re: LLC did not give schedule K-1 November 1, 2006, 4:52 pm
Re: LLC did not give schedule K-1 November 2, 2006, 12:48 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap