Home Page link  

Section 351 or 354 or Section 721?

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Section 351 or 354 or Section 721? David 11-17-2006
Posted by Drew Edmundson on November 30, 2006, 1:41 am
Please log in for more thread options

>> I would like to transfer publically traded stocks (like
>> Intel) from a personally titled Ameritrade account into a
>> new Partnership (LLC) account with Ameritrade. So long as I
>> maintain a majority control over the Partnership by
>> receiving the proper percentage of membership interest in
>> the LLC for the current market value of the stock
>> transferred, it is my belief that this would not be
>> considered a taxable event by the IRS under either Section
>> 721, Section 351, or Section 354. My personal basis on
>> each stock investment would therefore transfer to the LLC
>> and become the cost basis for each investment that the LLC
>> owns.
>>
>> The LLC will hold these investments long-term (possibly make
>> some new purchases with cash) and potentially (yet rarely)
>> sell and re-invest in other stocks (asset re-allocation).
>> In a sense, this would be an "investment company / LLC /
>> partnership". Section 721 and 351 makes note of an
>> exception to the rule referring to an "investment company"
>> (as defined in Section 351).
>>
>> Also, publically held stock may be considered an
>> "intangible" asset. Could you please explain whether section
>> (d) of Section 721 ("Transfers of intangibles") needs to be
>> considered in regards to this transfer in order to keep it a
>> non-taxable transfer?

> The paragraph you need to look at is 721(b), assuming the
> LLC is really a partnership for tax purposes.

Sorry, I see that you had already noticed this paragraph.

---
Drew Edmundson, CPA
Cary, NC

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
Section 121 January 23, 2007, 2:23 am
Section 645 October 26, 2007, 11:51 pm
Re: Section 645 October 28, 2007, 4:04 pm
Re: Section 645 October 29, 2007, 3:32 pm
Re: Section 645 October 30, 2007, 11:47 pm
Section 691(c) May 3, 2008, 1:25 pm
Re: Is This Section 179 Property? September 7, 2006, 4:24 am
Section 199 Deduction January 24, 2007, 2:34 am
Section 179 Expense January 30, 2007, 10:11 pm
Section 179 carryover April 12, 2007, 12:25 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap