Home Page link  

Stimulus Carryover to 2008?

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Stimulus Carryover to 2008? njoracle 04-16-2008
Posted by cpabakem01 on April 16, 2008, 2:08 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> A self employed person had a bad year in 2007 and had less then $3000
> income for 2007. Therefore, the person won't be eligible for a stimulus
> rebate. They expect 2008 income to be substantially higher then $3000.
> Will they be eligible to get the rebate in 2008 because they weren't
> eligible in 2007? The IRS FAQ's have a vague reference to this as a
> possibility but I'm not clear on the details.

Q. I don’t qualify for a Stimulus Payment based on my 2007 return. But
my tax situation will be different in 2008. Will I qualify for any
special benefit?

A. Possibly. The 2008 tax instructions will include a worksheet to
help those who did not qualify for a payment or those who received a
reduced amount determine if they can obtain a benefit when they file
their 2008 tax returns next year.

Milt Baker CPA
Michigan

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by removeps-groups@yahoo.com on April 16, 2008, 4:41 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> A self employed person had a bad year in 2007 and had less then $3000
> income for 2007. Therefore, the person won't be eligible for a stimulus
> rebate. They expect 2008 income to be substantially higher then $3000.
> Will they be eligible to get the rebate in 2008 because they weren't
> eligible in 2007? The IRS FAQ's have a vague reference to this as a
> possibility but I'm not clear on the details.

What do you mean by "substantially higher"? If the person is single
and their 2008 income is over 87k, they won't get a stimulus check (in
the form of a tax credit) on their 2008 return filed by April 2009.
Between 75k and 87k they get less than $600. Below 75k they get the
full amount.

PS: Someone correct me if I'm reading the rules wrong.

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by Barry Margolin on April 16, 2008, 7:03 pm
Please log in for more thread options
In article

>
> > A self employed person had a bad year in 2007 and had less then $3000
> > income for 2007. Therefore, the person won't be eligible for a stimulus
> > rebate. They expect 2008 income to be substantially higher then $3000.
> > Will they be eligible to get the rebate in 2008 because they weren't
> > eligible in 2007? The IRS FAQ's have a vague reference to this as a
> > possibility but I'm not clear on the details.
>
> What do you mean by "substantially higher"? If the person is single
> and their 2008 income is over 87k, they won't get a stimulus check (in
> the form of a tax credit) on their 2008 return filed by April 2009.
> Between 75k and 87k they get less than $600. Below 75k they get the
> full amount.
>
> PS: Someone correct me if I'm reading the rules wrong.

That would be a pretty volatile business, if he goes from making too
LITTLE one year, to making too MUCH the following year.

It's certainly possible, but probably pretty rare.

--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by Tom Russ on April 16, 2008, 8:39 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> That would be a pretty volatile business, if he goes from making too
> LITTLE one year, to making too MUCH the following year.
>
> It's certainly possible, but probably pretty rare.

I agree.

Although perhaps a real estate agent specializing in $10 million+
homes might be in that situation....

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by dpb on April 16, 2008, 10:30 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Tom Russ wrote:
>
>> That would be a pretty volatile business, if he goes from making too
>> LITTLE one year, to making too MUCH the following year.
>>
>> It's certainly possible, but probably pretty rare.
>
> I agree.
>
> Although perhaps a real estate agent specializing in $10 million+
> homes might be in that situation....

Easy enough in farming to go from one extreme to another (altho it's a
whole lit easier to stay on the losing end (damhikt) ).

--

--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
Stimulus Act 2008 - Rebate February 10, 2008, 2:42 pm
Question on Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 - HR 5140 February 9, 2008, 6:33 am
2008 Stimulus Payments: Direct Deposit April 30, 2008, 8:47 pm
Special Depreciation Allowance - Economic Stimulus Act 2008 August 5, 2008, 5:59 pm
Section 179 carryover April 12, 2007, 12:25 am
179 Carryover when incorporating November 12, 2007, 7:36 am
Can I "buy" capital loss carryover? June 19, 2007, 9:29 pm
FTC carryover statement for 1116 April 7, 2008, 5:13 pm
stock loss carryover and amt May 17, 2008, 11:56 pm
Capital Loss Carryover Duration January 15, 2007, 2:26 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap