|
Posted by John Levine on April 29, 2008, 4:22 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>> (before we got married), in a year when she moved from Tokyo to Palo
>> Alto, due to a mistake by her tax preparer writing down the date that
>> she moved.
>
>So did you manage it to get it back eventually?
Nope. It was 15 years ago, we don't even know where to find the guy
who made the mistake, and it wasn't all that much money.
R's,
John
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|
|
Posted by Dick Adams on April 29, 2008, 8:07 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> The California Franchise Board is very aggressive ....
That is a gross understatement. Attempts of the
Franchise Board to tax non-residents are legendary.
Dick
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|
|
Posted by Stuart Bronstein on April 29, 2008, 8:14 pm
Please log in for more thread options rdadams@panix.com (Dick Adams) wrote:
>
>> The California Franchise Board is very aggressive ....
>
> That is a gross understatement. Attempts of the
> Franchise Board to tax non-residents are legendary.
My guess is they're just as bad to residents.
Stu
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|
|
Posted by John Levine on April 29, 2008, 9:22 pm
Please log in for more thread options >> That is a gross understatement. Attempts of the
>> Franchise Board to tax non-residents are legendary.
>
>My guess is they're just as bad to residents.
I happen to run a tiny non-profit with a part-time California
employee, and the CFB writes me about once a year to garnish his
pay for some ancient tax liability or other.
In my case, my wife moved from Japan to California and was a part year
resident, but the problem was that her tax accountant wrote down the
wrong date on the California return. They grabbed money for the time
between when the return said she arrived and when she actually did
arrive. Good luck untangling that 15 years later.
R's,
John
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|
|
Posted by removeps-groups@yahoo.com on April 29, 2008, 12:45 pm
Please log in for more thread options On Apr 28, 7:30 pm, "removeps-gro...@yahoo.com" <removeps-
gro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is the reason he does not owe any CA taxes because of the foreign
> earned income exclusion -- IRS form 2555 which reduces your foreign
> earned income (mostly wages, self employment income, but not interest,
> dividends, capital gains) by about 85k?
BTW, I forget to add the the foreign earned income exclusion is not
recognized by California. So if he took 85,700 or 10,000 or any
amount, there would be a California adjustment of 87,500 or 10,000,
etc -- ie. the California AGI would be larger than the federal.
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | LLC for US Citizen / non-resident | July 2, 2006, 10:44 pm |
| Estate taxes between non-resident and a citizen | September 9, 2007, 10:09 pm |
| Re: Estate taxes between non-resident and a citizen | September 12, 2007, 10:05 pm |
| Re: Estate taxes between non-resident and a citizen | September 14, 2007, 12:35 am |
| Foreign Resident and Stock Options | January 12, 2007, 2:47 am |
| Foreign Resident Head of Household | April 16, 2007, 4:44 pm |
| New expat: US/Foreign tax & bona fide resident. | March 5, 2008, 9:45 am |
| Does a permanent resident have to pay taxes on foreign family gifts? | September 5, 2008, 2:17 am |
| Foreign Earned Income exclusion: bona fide resident rule allows > 30 day vacation in the USA? | March 19, 2007, 2:23 am |
| Illinois resident/non resident and schedule NR | April 9, 2007, 2:51 am |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap