Home Page link  

Wash Sale question (sort of) between IRA and non-IRA accounts (Advanced trading)

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Wash Sale question (sort of) between IRA and non-IRA accounts (Advanced trading) garagecapital 05-01-2007
Posted by DF2 on May 5, 2007, 6:36 am
Please log in for more thread options
garagecapital@gmail.com wrote:

> Let's say I had an IRA with $100K and a non-IRA brokerage
> account with $100K and my aim, for tax purposes was to
> generate losses in the non- IRA account but have off-setting
> positions in the IRA. (I would generally do this with
> futures options, btw.) I risk an accidental taxable gain
> offset if the Non-IRA profits and the IRA loses, and the
> latter , effectively, wipes out my gain. But in the inverse,
> if my IRA positions go up, I get a tax-deferred gain and a
> taxable loss in the non-IRA -- plus I have -- effectively --
> moved money from a taxable to a tax-deffered account. What's
> wrong with this scenario, besides the risk I already stated?
> Is there a legal issue I am unaware of? Seems to me if you
> do your probabilities correct and write futures options
> naked in the IRa and buy them in the non-IRA, you could --
> effctively -- money money into an IRA, with little risk, no?

I don't think this is the typical question. The typical
question would be along the lines that you take a loss in
the regular account, and a few days later you buy the same
security in an IRA account. People differ on that, and I am
one who believes that is allowed without being having a wash
sale.

This descriptions sounds like you are figuring out how to do
trades where you and your IRA are probable buyers and
sellers of the same trades. If you are coordinating the
trades between the account for effect, I think that would be
a very different situation. You appear to be describing what
I think would be clearly disallowed. Your last sentence
hints at something that I expect is illegal.

<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by nickr on May 7, 2007, 1:29 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> garagecapi...@gmail.com wrote:

>> Let's say I had an IRA with $100K and a non-IRA brokerage
>> account with $100K and my aim, for tax purposes was to
>> generate losses in the non- IRA account but have off-setting
>> positions in the IRA. (I would generally do this with
>> futures options, btw.) I risk an accidental taxable gain
>> offset if the Non-IRA profits and the IRA loses, and the
>> latter , effectively, wipes out my gain. But in the inverse,
>> if my IRA positions go up, I get a tax-deferred gain and a
>> taxable loss in the non-IRA -- plus I have -- effectively --
>> moved money from a taxable to a tax-deffered account. What's
>> wrong with this scenario, besides the risk I already stated?
>> Is there a legal issue I am unaware of? Seems to me if you
>> do your probabilities correct and write futures options
>> naked in the IRa and buy them in the non-IRA, you could --
>> effctively -- money money into an IRA, with little risk, no?

> I don't think this is the typical question. The typical
> question would be along the lines that you take a loss in
> the regular account, and a few days later you buy the same
> security in an IRA account. People differ on that, and I am
> one who believes that is allowed without being having a wash
> sale.
>
> This descriptions sounds like you are figuring out how to do
> trades where you and your IRA are probable buyers and
> sellers of the same trades. If you are coordinating the
> trades between the account for effect, I think that would be
> a very different situation. You appear to be describing what
> I think would be clearly disallowed. Your last sentence
> hints at something that I expect is illegal.

Ok, let's assume the issue is vague with the IRS on the wash
sales. But what if taking the tax-deduction on the loss
wasn't the reason for making the trades? Suppose all you
wantd to do was take $100,000 from a non-IRA account and put
it in your IRA account. Wouldn't offsetting trades do this
and since you're not going to tax the tax deduction the wash
sale rule doesn't apply. You're not trying to tax a tax
deduction but merely move funds into a tax-deferred account.
Or are wash sales illegal even if you don't take the tax
deduction?

<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by DF2 on May 8, 2007, 1:12 am
Please log in for more thread options
nickr wrote:

> Ok, let's assume the issue is vague with the IRS on the wash
> sales.

I assume that whether the wash sale rules include looking at
IRA transactions is a high-visibility thing. If the IRS
thought that a person who's IRA reinvested a dividend in GM
would be prohibited from taking a loss on a GM share sale
within 30 days of that dividend, they would not be shy about
saying so.

Yet some others come to a different conclusion.

> But what if taking the tax-deduction on the loss
> wasn't the reason for making the trades? Suppose all you
> wantd to do was take $100,000 from a non-IRA account and put
> it in your IRA account. Wouldn't offsetting trades do this
> and since you're not going to tax the tax deduction the wash
> sale rule doesn't apply. You're not trying to tax a tax
> deduction but merely move funds into a tax-deferred account.

I think that taking the loss there is fine, tho this could
come closer to being thought of as self dealing. I would
not interpret your simple act as being the "Advanced
trading" that garagecapital proposed. I am assuming that
the trades you described were such that they would be
unlikely to be trades between you and your IRA.
Advanced/clever strategies in this area raises my
suspicions.

See the discussions on self dealing:
http://www.trustetc.com/investment/prohibited-ira-transactions.html
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ira.+%22self+dealing%22&btnG=Search

> Or are wash sales illegal even if you don't take the tax
> deduction?

Wash sales are not illegal. Not properly reporting them as
such would be.

My opinions in tax rules are non-expert.

<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>

Posted by Seth on May 9, 2007, 4:32 pm
Please log in for more thread options
wrote:

> Or are wash sales illegal even if you don't take the tax
> deduction?

Wash sales are perfectly legal. The only issue is the
deduction.

However, if you knew a way to do a trade in your IRA that
would gain $100,000 and the reverse trade in your outside
account that would lose $100,000, why not just do the trade
in your IRA and get rich?

Seth

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Posted by nickr on May 9, 2007, 4:32 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> nickr wrote:

>> Ok, let's assume the issue is vague with the IRS on the wash
>> sales.

> I assume that whether the wash sale rules include looking at
> IRA transactions is a high-visibility thing. If the IRS
> thought that a person who's IRA reinvested a dividend in GM
> would be prohibited from taking a loss on a GM share sale
> within 30 days of that dividend, they would not be shy about
> saying so.
>
> Yet some others come to a different conclusion.

>> But what if taking the tax-deduction on the loss
>> wasn't the reason for making the trades? Suppose all you
>> wantd to do was take $100,000 from a non-IRA account and put
>> it in your IRA account. Wouldn't offsetting trades do this
>> and since you're not going to tax the tax deduction the wash
>> sale rule doesn't apply. You're not trying to tax a tax
>> deduction but merely move funds into a tax-deferred account.

> I think that taking the loss there is fine, tho this could
> come closer to being thought of as self dealing. I would
> not interpret your simple act as being the "Advanced
> trading" that garagecapital proposed. I am assuming that
> the trades you described were such that they would be
> unlikely to be trades between you and your IRA.
> Advanced/clever strategies in this area raises my
> suspicions.
>
> See the discussions on self
dealing:http://www.trustetc.com/investment/prohibited-ira-transactions.htmlhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ira.+%22self+dealing%22&btnG=Search

>> Or are wash sales illegal even if you don't take the tax
>> deduction?

> Wash sales are not illegal. Not properly reporting them as
> such would be.
>
> My opinions in tax rules are non-expert.

How does one properly report a wash sale when the gain is in
an IRA and the loss is in a taxible account? Does one simple
report the gain and thus make the IRA a taxable rather than
tax-deferred instrument? What about future gains, dividends,
et-cetera on the position in the IRA? Are they taxible, too?
For how long? Even taking a one-time tax hit on a gain might
be worth it if the after-tax money can grow tax- deferred
for 20-30 years, no?

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
Wash sale in different accounts March 16, 2008, 12:43 am
wash sale question February 6, 2007, 10:36 pm
Wash Sale December 8, 2007, 4:20 pm
wash sale February 3, 2008, 2:26 pm
Is this a wash sale? March 16, 2008, 8:17 pm
wash sale Qs April 9, 2008, 9:08 am
Wash sale? October 28, 2008, 10:22 pm
Calculation of 30 day wash sale October 20, 2008, 4:56 pm
Wash sale interpretation October 27, 2008, 3:26 pm
Partial wash sale in Taxcut March 14, 2008, 1:28 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap