Home Page link  

bank error in minimum distribution -

 

Taxes General Forum - Tax professionals meeting place and answers to queries. (Moderated)

 Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
bank error in minimum distribution - mvl_groups_user 01-30-2007
Posted by mvl_groups_user on January 30, 2007, 11:11 am
Please log in for more thread options
I noticed what appears to be an error in my bank's required
minimum distribution calculation.

I am a beneficiary where the former ira owner died before
the required beginning date.

I have been taking distributions based on the single life
expectancy minus x years formula. It appears that my bank
has been erroneously calculating single life expectancy anew
each year, resulting in 5-10% lower distributions than my
true RMD in year 2 and beyond.

Two questions:
1) Must I file form 5329, since the 5329 instructions state
"If the trustee, custodian, or issuer of your IRA informs
you of the minimum required distribution, you can use that
amount." Or should I file 5329 showing no excess
accumulations and therefore no tax? Or should I calculate
it the RMD on my own, show the tax, and write the excuse
letter?

2) This has been happenning for 2 years. Are excess
accumulations additive, in that if I were $100 short in
2005, and $200 short in 2006, do I owe tax on 50% of $300 in
2006? I see this logic in the 590 for excess contributions,
but not excess accumulations.

-MVL

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Posted by Kreig Mitchell on January 30, 2007, 9:52 pm
Please log in for more thread options
mvl_groups_u...@yahoo.com wrote:

> I noticed what appears to be an error in my bank's required
> minimum distribution calculation.
>
> I am a beneficiary where the former ira owner died before
> the required beginning date.
>
> I have been taking distributions based on the single life
> expectancy minus x years formula. It appears that my bank
> has been erroneously calculating single life expectancy anew
> each year, resulting in 5-10% lower distributions than my
> true RMD in year 2 and beyond.
>
> Two questions:
> 1) Must I file form 5329, since the 5329 instructions state
> "If the trustee, custodian, or issuer of your IRA informs
> you of the minimum required distribution, you can use that
> amount." Or should I file 5329 showing no excess
> accumulations and therefore no tax? Or should I calculate
> it the RMD on my own, show the tax, and write the excuse
> letter?
>
> 2) This has been happenning for 2 years. Are excess
> accumulations additive, in that if I were $100 short in
> 2005, and $200 short in 2006, do I owe tax on 50% of $300 in
> 2006? I see this logic in the 590 for excess contributions,
> but not excess accumulations.

If a significant amount of money is involved you might hire
a tax attorney to (1) research the issue or (2) obtain a
letter ruling from the IRS.

Kreig Mitchell
www.irstaxtrouble.com
www.irstaxtrouble.com/blog.htm

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Posted by Benjamin Yazersky CPA on January 30, 2007, 9:52 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> I noticed what appears to be an error in my bank's required
> minimum distribution calculation.
>
> I am a beneficiary where the former ira owner died before
> the required beginning date.
>
> I have been taking distributions based on the single life
> expectancy minus x years formula. It appears that my bank
> has been erroneously calculating single life expectancy anew
> each year, resulting in 5-10% lower distributions than my
> true RMD in year 2 and beyond.
>
> Two questions:
> 1) Must I file form 5329, since the 5329 instructions state
> "If the trustee, custodian, or issuer of your IRA informs
> you of the minimum required distribution, you can use that
> amount." Or should I file 5329 showing no excess
> accumulations and therefore no tax? Or should I calculate
> it the RMD on my own, show the tax, and write the excuse
> letter?
>
> 2) This has been happenning for 2 years. Are excess
> accumulations additive, in that if I were $100 short in
> 2005, and $200 short in 2006, do I owe tax on 50% of $300 in
> 2006? I see this logic in the 590 for excess contributions,
> but not excess accumulations.

depending on the distribution options chosen, it may be
correct

___________________________________
<<< Benjamin Yazersky, CPA [NJ & NY] >>>
-----> real address on hobokeni or hobokenx <-----

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Posted by lurker on February 5, 2007, 8:03 pm
Please log in for more thread options
mvl_groups_user@yahoo.com wrote:

[clip]
> It appears that my bank has been erroneously calculating
> single life expectancy anew each year, resulting in 5-10%
> lower distributions than my true RMD in year 2 and beyond.
[clip]

As a non professional wicked in spread sheet skills, I have
been forecasting my own "What if's" regarding my 401K. One
of the observations that complicated the math prediction
formulas for "Required Minimum Distributions" surprised me,
but makes sense if you think about it.

Publication 590, "Life Expetantcy Tables" shows that we are
"expected" to live longer each year that we get older.

In other words, the older you get, the older you are
expected to get. It increases a fractional year each year
you survive. The actual RMD is a victim of that
complication since life expectancy is a moving target.

<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>

Similar ThreadsPosted
Change in Maximum Age to Begin Required Minimum Distribution from Retirement Accounts October 4, 2008, 3:55 pm
Operator error, not TaxWise error! January 29, 2008, 9:29 pm
Form W-3c for Error in Box 16 & 17 of W-3? January 16, 2008, 5:10 pm
IRS Keypunching error September 16, 2008, 8:39 pm
Roth IRA contribution error June 3, 2006, 9:44 am
How to handle rounding error on W2, W3, DE 3BHW, DE 3HW? January 15, 2008, 7:50 pm
Error in TaxCut Program - WARNING April 14, 2006, 4:04 am
self employment income reporting error ... help please! June 17, 2006, 9:05 pm
Minimum income for NYS filing... March 17, 2008, 7:56 am
Question regarding error on prior year(s) returns February 6, 2007, 10:17 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
This site is not affiliated with Intuit - makers of Quickbooks and Quicken software
This site is not affiliated with Sage Software - makers of Peachtree accounting software
XML SitemapXML Sitemap