|
Posted by Benjamin Yazersky CPA on January 30, 2007, 9:52 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> I noticed what appears to be an error in my bank's required
> minimum distribution calculation.
>
> I am a beneficiary where the former ira owner died before
> the required beginning date.
>
> I have been taking distributions based on the single life
> expectancy minus x years formula. It appears that my bank
> has been erroneously calculating single life expectancy anew
> each year, resulting in 5-10% lower distributions than my
> true RMD in year 2 and beyond.
>
> Two questions:
> 1) Must I file form 5329, since the 5329 instructions state
> "If the trustee, custodian, or issuer of your IRA informs
> you of the minimum required distribution, you can use that
> amount." Or should I file 5329 showing no excess
> accumulations and therefore no tax? Or should I calculate
> it the RMD on my own, show the tax, and write the excuse
> letter?
>
> 2) This has been happenning for 2 years. Are excess
> accumulations additive, in that if I were $100 short in
> 2005, and $200 short in 2006, do I owe tax on 50% of $300 in
> 2006? I see this logic in the 590 for excess contributions,
> but not excess accumulations.
depending on the distribution options chosen, it may be
correct
___________________________________
<<< Benjamin Yazersky, CPA [NJ & NY] >>>
-----> real address on hobokeni or hobokenx <-----
<< ======================================================= >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2006) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ======================================================= >>
|