|
Posted by Gil Faver on June 20, 2008, 12:38 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Stuart Bronstein wrote:
> ...
>
>> You may have noticed that I did spend some time to research this a bit
>> more - yes I have better things to do but I feel like procrastinating at
>> the moment. The California courts actually do agree with Bill in
>> concept, though in practice their definition of "consideration" for gifts
>> to charity is considerably broader than in other cases, and they can
>> generally find some reason to enforce a pledge.
>
> Seems like I recall a case with an (Ivy League maybe?) school a while back
> where they donor won although I'm not sure whether the suit actually went
> to trial or the university/endowment association backed off owing to the
> criticism received from the action...
I believe that case involved a substantial gift to be used for a specific
purpose, and the school just blew off the specific purpose.
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|