|
Posted by Harlan Lunsford on June 9, 2008, 4:15 pm
Please log in for more thread options
eagent wrote:
(snipped....)
>
> I'd bet this was supposed to be an asset sale and NOT a stock sale
> since that is the norm. As an asset sale, either her or her new
> company purchased the assets of the old business from the old
> company. An asset sale allows the new company to restart
> depreciation.
Gene, I got the impression it was a sale of stock between old and new owner.
>
(snipped....)
>
> The best recommendation I can make is for your client to pony up the
> sales agreement. Then either you read it, if you understand such
> things, or you have it read by a professional tax preparer who is
> experienced with such things. Then you can get the real scoop on how
> it should be.
Yes, we would all be interested as to what actually happened. Please
let us know, Elizabeth.
>
> I do have a question - why is there a differnent account for the
> business return? How come you aren't doing both?
This is a great question, Gene. If new owner owns 100% of the stock
(seems so, since she is "purchasing an s-corp via a 10-year structured
installment agreement."), then she should be the one to hire and fire,
and/or choose the corporate accountant.
What are we missing now? (grin)
ChEAr$,
Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA
--
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
<< The foregoing was not intended or written to be used, >>
<< nor can it used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties >>
<< that may be imposed upon the taxpayer. >>
<< >>
<< The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting posts >>
<< to this newsgroup as well as our anti-spamming policy >>
<< are at www.asktax.org. >>
<< Copyright (2007) - All rights reserved. >>
<< ------------------------------------------------------- >>
|